The hippies at Greenpeace released a new report called How dirty is your data, that graded the energy choices the power cloud computing of technologies used by Amazon, Akamai, Apple, Facebook, Google, HP, IBM, Microsoft, Twitter, and Yahoo. Companies were assessed across three “green” categories: transparency, mitigating strategy, and infrastructure siting. Greenpeace cracked the ruler by failing Apple in the “infrastructure siting” category over its new $1 billion data center in North Carolina which requires the energy equivalent of powering 80,000 homes. Greenpeace had this to say:
“Apple’s decision to locate its iDataCenter in North Carolina, which has an electrical grid among the dirtiest in the country (61% coal, 31% nuclear) indicates a lack of a corporate commitment to clean energy supply for its cloud operations. The fact that the alternative location for Apple’s iDataCenter was Virginia, where electricity also comes from very dirty sources, is an indication that, in addition to tax incentives, access to inexpensive energy, regardless of its source, is a key driver in Apple’s site selection”
Big deal. Now stop bothering me to sign up for your bullshit cause every time I walk out of The Camp.
[via: 9to5Mac]


About iceman
Recent Posts
Italy misses World Cup, Gennaro Gattuso out
"I need to leave it in the hands of a new technical team going into the future."
Fernando Mendoza wanted to showcase teammates during Pro Day
"I just wanted to make sure everybody could showcase their abilities in front of all 32 NFL teams."
Jerry Jones in favor of NFL’s technological advancement
"Fans deserve that.”
JJ Redick vouches for Luka Doncic as MVP
"He's the engine that's driving all of our winning."
Mike Macdonald excited about running back room
Coach is ready to get rolling.
Kim Mulkey addresses retirement rumors
"I’m going to be in this game unless LSU fires me."